Skip to content

China restricts online discussion about its digital ID plan, suppressing critical voices and opinions.

Digital identity system proposal sparks online opposition, with social media moderators eliminating remarks criticizing the move.

Controversial national digital ID proposal faces resistance online, sparking censorship of opposing...
Controversial national digital ID proposal faces resistance online, sparking censorship of opposing social media comments

China restricts online discussion about its digital ID plan, suppressing critical voices and opinions.

UK Police to Bolster Facial Recognition Technology With £220 Million Funding

The United Kingdom's police forces have announced a three-year plan to expand their utilization of facial recognition technology, earmarking £220 million for the initiative. The aim is to enhance the deployment of this technology across England and Wales[3].

As part of this investment, the Home Office has allocated £10 million towards procuring live facial recognition vehicles. These vehicles will be utilized in future deployment, with the broader strategy being to incorporate facial recognition into law enforcement. The first permanent facial recognition cameras are set to be installed in Croydon, London[1][4].

The Ada Lovelace Institute has raised concerns about the government's implementation of facial recognition technology, stating that existing governance frameworks are insufficient, potentially eroding public trust and legal legitimacy[1][2]. Privacy concerns are also prevalent, particularly with regard to the potential for mass surveillance and access to extensive databases, such as passport and immigration records[4][5].

The inconsistent legislation on the acceptable use of facial recognition technology poses a threat to public trust and could lead to legal challenges. Despite the potential legal risks highlighted by the Bridges judgment, the deployment of live facial recognition continues[5].

Internal documents suggest that live facial recognition cameras may become commonplace in England and Wales, signaling a shift in policing practices[4]. There is an increasing demand for risk-based legislation to provide clarity on the legality of facial recognition technology use and to address the fragmented regulatory framework[1].

  1. Amidst this expansion of facial recognition technology, the cybersecurity implications and potential risks for general-news related to privacy infringement and mass surveillance are becoming significant issues in the politics of the UK.
  2. As cybersecurity concerns arise with the increased use of facial recognition technology, it is crucial for the government to establish clear regulations, provide transparency, and strengthen public trust in the implementation of such technology in the realm of law enforcement and general-news.

Read also:

    Latest