Skip to content

Competition in the world for dominance over battery supply chains escalates further

Uncover the global competition among countries as they strive for dominance in the economic sphere and energy stability through control of the battery supply chain.

Competition Ambits Higher Over Worldwide Domination of Battery Production Networks
Competition Ambits Higher Over Worldwide Domination of Battery Production Networks

Competition in the world for dominance over battery supply chains escalates further

The electric vehicle (EV) revolution is gaining momentum, and two key players in this transformation are the German government and the European Union. Both are working in unison to bolster growth in the battery logistics chain, with positive developments in Berlin and Brussels. Key companies in Germany, primarily from the automotive and e-mobility sectors, are responding to increased EV registrations and government policies that support these industries.

At the heart of this revolution lies the battery industry, a sector that is projected to become a $360 billion global market by 2030. The battery chemistry landscape is evolving rapidly, with LFP (Lithium Iron Phosphate) chemistry growing from 10% to over 30% of the global EV battery market since 2020. Premium automakers, in search of longer ranges for their flagship models, are increasingly adopting NMC811.

Each of these battery chemistries offers distinct advantages. NMC (Nickel-Manganese-Cobalt) boasts higher energy density, longer range, and a premium positioning. On the other hand, LFP offers lower cost, longer cycle life, enhanced safety, and mass market accessibility. LMFP (Lithium Manganese Iron Phosphate) provides improved energy density at a moderate cost. These strategic choices in battery chemistry determine performance characteristics, cost structures, and raw material requirements, making them central to competitive strategy in the global race for battery supply chain control.

The emergence of gigafactories has transformed battery economics through unprecedented scale. These manufacturing facilities, producing at least 10 gigawatt-hours of batteries annually, have become the industrial backbone of the electric revolution. A typical gigafactory has a minimum production threshold of 10+ GWh annually, an average construction timeline of 24-36 months, and requires a typical investment of $1-2 billion per 10 GWh capacity.

The battery industry's critical minerals, such as lithium, cobalt, nickel, and graphite, are significantly geographically concentrated in their extraction and processing. China, for instance, processes approximately 90% of global lithium, 72% of cobalt, and 65% of nickel for batteries, and produces over 75% of all lithium-ion battery cells globally.

Countries that establish leadership positions in the battery supply chain reap multiple strategic benefits. These include control over critical minerals, creation of high-value manufacturing jobs, technological leadership in the clean energy transition, and reduced vulnerability to supply disruptions and price volatility. The employment creation in a gigafactory is approximately 1,000-3,000 direct jobs per facility.

In conclusion, the electric revolution is being driven by the rapid evolution of battery chemistry and the emergence of gigafactories. As the global battery market continues to grow, strategic choices in battery chemistry and the establishment of leadership positions in the battery supply chain will determine the winners in this global race.

Read also:

Latest