Financial regulators in India assess potential instabilities in Decentralized Finance (DeFi) and cryptocurrency markets, as these sectors near a significant growth threshold, referred to as "critical mass".

Financial regulators in India assess potential instabilities in Decentralized Finance (DeFi) and cryptocurrency markets, as these sectors near a significant growth threshold, referred to as "critical mass".

In a recent paper published by the Bank for International Settlements (BIS), the financial stability risks associated with cryptocurrencies and decentralized finance (DeFi) are explored in depth. The paper identifies several key areas of concern, including monetary sovereignty erosion, transparency deficits, capital flight from emerging economies, price volatility, growing illicit activities, and fragmentation in regulatory frameworks.

One of the primary risks highlighted in the paper is the fragility and monetary risks associated with stablecoins. The BIS warns that these digital assets exhibit fragility in their peg to fiat currencies, threatening monetary sovereignty and enabling capital flight from emerging markets. Stablecoins also raise transparency issues and could potentially shift large payment volumes outside traditional financial systems, disrupting financial stability.

Another significant risk is price volatility in non-stable cryptocurrencies like Bitcoin. The paper notes that this volatility makes them risky for wider adoption in treasury and business functions, as highlighted by CFO concerns in North America.

The paper also addresses the issue of illicit use and regulatory gaps in DeFi and stablecoins. The Financial Action Task Force (FATF) notes a rise in illicit activities involving stablecoins and DeFi, including scams, fraud, and thefts, compounded by difficulties in enforcing regulations such as the Travel Rule and challenges in identifying virtual asset service providers (VASPs).

Regulatory fragmentation is another concern, with different jurisdictions adopting divergent approaches. For example, the U.S. GENIUS Act mandates that stablecoin issuers hold 100% reserves to back the stablecoins in circulation, aiming to protect consumers and maintain systemic stability. In contrast, the EU’s Markets in Crypto-assets (MiCA) Regulation imposes strict transparency and operational oversight on crypto-assets and stablecoins, though this can present compliance challenges, especially for SMEs.

Regulators are responding to these risks with stricter reserve requirements, enhanced transparency rules, and international coordination. For instance, FATF is pushing for better Anti-Money Laundering (AML) and Counter Financing of Terrorism (CFT) standards for virtual assets and providers worldwide.

The paper also proposes imposing similar requirements to traditional finance (TradFi) on DeFi, including know your customer compliance, disclosures, and adequate training and qualifications for market professionals. The financial stability implications of real world asset (RWA) tokenization are a top priority for research, including systemic risks of tighter linkages between DeFi and TradFi.

The paper suggests that the issuance of Bitcoin ETFs, the expansion of stablecoins, and RWA tokenization are changing the minimal linkages between crypto and TradFi. Traditional finance (TradFi) asset managers and broker dealers are becoming more involved in the crypto market, and decentralized exchanges (DEXs) could start to be used more widely by TradFi firms and become part of the mainstream.

However, the paper does not discuss any specific policy recommendations for addressing the financial stability risks in the crypto and DeFi markets. The role of decentralized autonomous organizations (DAOs) in governance and their impact on financial stability is a topic for further research.

The BIS paper concludes that the crypto market has reached critical mass, although it is still considered as having minimal linkages to traditional finance (TradFi). The cryptoisation risks for emerging market economies is a topic that the International Monetary Fund (IMF) has been highlighting for some time. Another central banker, the ECB's Ulrich Bindseil, has made a similar observation about bitcoin, noting that it redistributes wealth from late investors to earlier ones, who tend to be wealthier.

In summary, the main financial stability risks center on stablecoins' fragile pegs, regulatory divergence, illicit activity risks in DeFi, and price volatility in non-stable cryptos. Regulators are responding with stricter reserve requirements, enhanced transparency rules, and international coordination to mitigate these risks and protect broader economic stability.

1. The Bank for International Settlements (BIS) paper suggests that the issuance of Bitcoin ETFs, the expansion of stablecoins, and RWA tokenization are changing the minimal linkages between cryptocurrencies and traditional finance (TradFi).
2. The paper proposes imposing similar requirements to traditional finance on DeFi, including know your customer compliance, disclosures, and adequate training and qualifications for market professionals.
3. The BIS notes that the crypto market has reached critical mass, although it is still considered as having minimal linkages to traditional finance (TradFi).
4. Stablecoins raise transparency issues and could potentially shift large payment volumes outside traditional financial systems, disrupting financial stability.
5. The Financial Action Task Force (FATF) notes a rise in illicit activities involving stablecoins and DeFi, including scams, fraud, and thefts, compounded by difficulties in enforcing regulations such as the Travel Rule and challenges in identifying virtual asset service providers (VASPs).

Read also: