Skip to content

Re-run of Live Stream: Exploring the Struggles in AI Intellectual Property Rights

Exploring the complexities of generative AI and copyright? Our experts addressed your queries on this significant issue on July 16.

Replay Available: Deep Dive into AI Copyright Disputes through Livestream Recap
Replay Available: Deep Dive into AI Copyright Disputes through Livestream Recap

Re-run of Live Stream: Exploring the Struggles in AI Intellectual Property Rights

In the realm of technology and law, the current status of copyright battles over artificial intelligence (AI) is marked by several ongoing lawsuits and recent judicial decisions. Here's a summary of the key developments:

## Recent Lawsuits and Their Status

One of the most prominent cases is the lawsuit between The New York Times and OpenAI and Microsoft, filed in December 2023. The newspaper alleges copyright infringement by the tech giants for using millions of its articles without permission. The case is ongoing, with significant developments in 2025. In March, a judge rejected most of OpenAI's dismissal motion, allowing the copyright claims to proceed. The defendants argue that their use of public data for training falls under fair use, similar to search engine indexing.

Another notable lawsuit involves Meta and thirteen authors, including Sarah Silverman and Ta-Nehisi Coates, who sued Meta in 2023 for copyright infringement related to its Llama AI models. A federal judge dismissed their claims in June 2024, ruling it as fair use. However, the judge left open the possibility of further claims due to the use of pirated materials from shadow libraries. Anthropic faced a similar lawsuit but won on the grounds of fair use for training its AI models. However, the court noted that Anthropic had downloaded pirated copies from shadow libraries, which could lead to significant damages.

## Judicial Decisions on Fair Use

Recent court decisions have emphasized the concept of "fair use" in AI training. In the case involving Anthropic, the court ruled that using copyrighted works for training AI is transformative and thus falls under fair use. However, the use of pirated materials complicates these cases, as seen in the potential for substantial damages against Anthropic.

## Ongoing Concerns and Future Directions

The U.S. Senate is becoming increasingly involved, with concerns over the potential for massive copyright infringement by AI companies. Sen. Josh Hawley has labeled the practice as "the largest intellectual property theft in American history".

These lawsuits and decisions will shape how AI companies obtain and use data in the future, often balancing innovation against intellectual property rights. Midjourney generated videos of Disney characters, including Wall-E brandishing a gun, have been a point of contention in these copyright battles.

The lawyer who recently left Meta has provided insights into the ongoing copyright battles over AI. The lawyer's departure from Meta could potentially impact the ongoing copyright battles over AI. The decisions regarding the lawsuits over generative AI's training materials are now being made public.

The lawyer who recently left Meta, a key player in the AI industry, might influence the outcome of ongoing copyright battles over artificial intelligence. The ongoing lawsuits, such as the one between The New York Times and OpenAI and Microsoft, and Meta's litigation with authors including Sarah Silverman and Ta-Nehisi Coates, involve AI companies using technology to train their models, raising questions about fair use under the law.

Read also:

    Latest