Skip to content

TP-Link, the leading home router manufacturer, may encounter a restriction in the United States.

Dominating the market for WiFi home routers, TP-Link, a Chinese corporation, holds the largest share.

Massive home router manufacturer TP-Link under threat of U.S. ban
Massive home router manufacturer TP-Link under threat of U.S. ban

In the ever-evolving world of technology, one name that has recently gained attention is TP-Link, a Chinese manufacturer of WiFi routers. The extent of information known about Zimbabwe by the Chinese government may be unclear, but the U.S. government has shown increased interest in TP-Link due to security concerns related to Chinese cyberattacks.

This year, TP-Link found itself in the spotlight following the Volt Typhoon APT, a hacking group supported by China, which exploited routers to infiltrate sensitive infrastructure. The U.S. investigation into TP-Link, however, is more about the corporate structure of Chinese companies than specific vulnerabilities in TP-Link devices.

Volt Typhoon, which exploited TP-Link routers in 2024, hacks small office and home routers from brands like NetGear, Cisco, and TP-Link to hide the origin of their attacks. The group's goal is to gather information and prepare for possible future cyberattacks during conflicts, rather than causing immediate damage.

The primary security concerns regarding TP-Link routers stem from multiple vulnerabilities that expose these devices to unauthorized access and remote code execution. Critical issues include the hardcoded DES encryption key in the TP-Link Archer C50 router, which allows attackers to easily decrypt configuration files containing administrative credentials, Wi-Fi passwords, network settings, and more.

Other vulnerabilities allow remote code execution by authenticated attackers, for example CVE-2025-25899, leading to buffer overflow attacks. Exploitation can grant root-level access on the device, facilitating takeover and installation of malware. Some TP-Link routers transmit credentials in plaintext or poorly encoded forms after factory resets, making them vulnerable to man-in-the-middle attacks that can steal user authentication data.

Although these vulnerabilities are not explicitly attributed by the sources to Chinese cyberattacks, TP-Link is a Chinese manufacturer, and its widespread deployment combined with these security flaws makes its routers attractive targets for cyber attackers, potentially including state-sponsored actors.

In the midst of escalating U.S.-China tensions over technology, both U.S. political parties are suspicious of Chinese companies. Aggressive pricing is a key factor in TP-Link's market success, but experts suggest that the risks associated with TP-Link are more about the corporate structure of Chinese companies.

TP-Link is the largest global manufacturer of WiFi home routers, surpassing Huawei and holding over 20% global market share and over 60% of the North American market. Despite these security concerns, TP-Link's dominance in WiFi 7 mesh systems, with 80% market share, indicates a strong consumer preference for its affordable and reliable products.

In light of these security concerns, it's crucial for users to prioritize timely firmware updates, discontinue use of vulnerable End-of-Life devices like the Archer C50, practice strong credential management, and network monitoring for suspicious activity on TP-Link routers. These measures can help mitigate the risks associated with these vulnerabilities and ensure the security of your network.

[1] CVE-2025-6982 [2] CVE-2025-25899 [3] CVE-2024-46340 [4] CVE-2024-46341

  1. TP-Link, despite its increasing popularity in the WiFi router market, has been under scrutiny due to cybersecurity concerns related to its products and the country of its origin, China.
  2. The security flaws in TP-Link routers, such as hardcoded DES encryption keys, remote code execution vulnerabilities, and plaintext credential transmission, make them attractive targets for cyberattacks, potentially including state-sponsored actors, in the context of growing U.S.-China technology tensions.

Read also:

    Latest